 |
Information Literacy Instructors' Experiences
of the Teaching Role
Dr. Heidi Julien and Cameron Hoffman,
University of Alberta
session 3d / Thursday, May 11 / 3:30 - 5:00
Interviews with library staff over a decade of
research have suggested that some may be uncomfortable with the instructional
expectations they encounter in their work, or may even feel antagonistic
towards instructional goals. Thus, a new interview study of library staff is
being undertaken to explore their experiences and perspectives about their
teaching roles in the context of information literacy instruction. The specific
research question addressed by the study is: how do library staff with
instructional roles experience and relate to those roles and what might be the
implications of those self-understandings for instructional outcomes? This
question will be explored through interviews in January-April 2006 with library
staff who have experience doing information literacy instruction in academic
and public library settings. Thus, the presentation will be reporting on very
recent data, and will provide opportunity for the professional community to
offer feedback about the study results. This interview study will act as a
pilot project for a more in-depth, longer-term analysis of the research
question, expected to begin shortly following the WILU 2006 conference.
Sociological role theory is being used as an interpretive lens for this work.
Theoretically, this research will advance understanding of professional
identity; from a practical perspective it will contribute towards improving
instructional efforts. Current instruction may not be entirely successful, in
part because of some perceived ambivalence within the library community about
its role in these efforts. It is critical to explore the reasons for that
ambivalence in order to identify means to overcome it. Participants in the
session will learn more about how a range of library staff experience the
teaching role, have an opportunity to discuss their own experiences and relate
those to the study results, and will be able to identify opportunities for
improvement in information literacy instruction.
|